The Greatest Showman - Chapter 2465

[Two thousand four hundred and twenty-eight success 1 and a half]

“Independent Telegram,” Sixty Points, “Colin Trevorrow, like most genre film directors, they can find the bottom line of commercial films, but when trying to move to a higher level, But always lost himself in the balance between stupidity and seriousness.”

“Daily News”, Sixty Points, “It could have been worse, but thank God Renly-Hall saved the work; sorry What

‘s more, Renly didn’t get rid of the panic and fear of the dinosaur chase either, and the final product of the film could barely pass the line.”

“Vanity Fair,” Sixty Points, “The movie is interesting enough to keep the audience’s attention to the finish line .

; But after watching the movie, I can realize that compared to the connotation and depth of the script, it is far from enough. The problem is not whether the dinosaurs are fresh and vivid, but that relying on dinosaurs alone is not enough. The only correct choice is Renly- Hall’s presence has made the movie more possible, and I’m willing to walk into the movie theater for the sequel—provided he can still be on the cast list during the sequel.”

The Washington Post, 6 Ten, “It’s hard to tell whether ‘Jurassic World’ wants to be popcorn-style junk food, or wants to go further. Colin Trevorrow is trying to do more on the thematic level , the problem is that he seems to want to try too many things.”

“Chicago Sun,” Sixty Points, “There must be one out of every three Americans who would go into a movie theater to see the ‘Jurassic’ Ji World’, they can find exactly what they expect to see, no more, no less. Sadly, the ‘not much’ part is disappointing. This is a Renly Hall The movie, we look forward to seeing more and more valuable things beyond his performance.

” Los Angeles Times, Sixty Points, “‘Jurassic World’ looks like a big Hot production, it has all the ingredients for a movie to explode at the box office, seriousness and humor, characters and story, and of course, popcorn-esque thrills, all smashed together in a blender; But does the jumble of pieces really keep audiences looking forward to it? Renly Hall is still the best part of the movie, but that’s all there is to it.”

After a rough scan, it is not difficult to find that there are not a few media that give middle reviews, and there are many authoritative people such as the “Los Angeles Times” and “Chicago Sun”.

A variety of viewpoints have a little similarity, but the rich and complex cores are not able to be discussed further, and finally the film stays at a level of no-top, no-no-no-no, sometimes, this means balance; And sometimes, it means moderation — obviously, Jurassic World falls into the latter category.

When Renly got the script, he put forward a similar point of view: the script is too ambitious, many branches are scattered, and there are too many issues to try to discuss, but all of them are only scratches of the water and not in-depth, which also makes Those thoughts that stay lukewarm can instead lead to distraction for the audience.

later,

The script was adjusted according to Renly’s ideas, and the relationship between Owen and Blair was used as a dark thread to connect related thoughts about the use of dinosaurs as weapons of war. – Trevorrow is still not willing to give up the foreshadowing of those branch lines, which also causes the theme of the movie to be a little complicated, which affects the viewing experience.

Naturally, this has become the focus of critics’ attacks.

But Andy thought it was very interesting.

First of all, when Renly took over the script, he raised relevant opinions and raised concerns about the quality of the finished film; and the current media reaction just confirms Renly’s evaluation, which once again proves Renly’s unique interpretation of the script .

Second, if you carefully browse the content of the negative and medium reviews, it is not difficult to find that the negative reviews mainly focus on the scheduling and control of the entire movie, which is also the most important part of commercial popcorn movies. If you can’t catch the audience’s attention If it is too powerful, then everything will be in vain; while the central review mainly focuses on the interpretation and expression of the core, which is the key for commercial films to become excellent from the pass level. The audience is not only stimulated, but also looking forward to being able to Get more experience.

The fact that “Titanic” and “Avatar” can create miracles in film history is definitely not that simple. Obviously expecting more from Jurassic World.

So, can “Jurassic World” bring more?

For this question, we have to look at the opinions of the favorable media – the lower limit is determined by the negative review, and the upper limit is determined by the favorable review.

‘Empire’, ninety-five points, ”Jurassic World’ is a popcorn comedy of pure, goofy, wall-banging joy, and when you come in and take over the 3D glasses, you can temporarily store your brain in Baggage, then take it back when you leave. The entertainment effect is comparable to the ‘Avengers’ three years ago, and even more commendable is that Renly Hall’s charm is enough to make up for the number advantage of the six original Avengers .”

“The Hollywood Reporter,” Ninety Points, “Trevor has done an excellent job, every link is correct, with admirable rhythm control throughout; Trevor can be felt through the movie’s big screen If you try to pay homage to the urgent desire of Spielberg’s 1993 work that turned out, and he succeeds. The most beautiful part is undoubtedly the comprehensive scheduling of the climax, the audience will not forget the blue color while lamenting the excitement of the dinosaur showdown. Elie Hall’s Significant Presence.”

The New York Times, Ninety Points, “‘Jurassic World’ is a work desperately needed this summer. It’s not as esoteric as ‘Interstellar’ or ‘Gravity’ The works did not present any new content; however, when all the contradictions and conflicts came together and collided with precious sparks, the full burst of adrenaline could make the audience enjoy the thrill of blood and violence, and the actors’ accurate The performance is also a highlight.”

“Variety”, 88 points, “There is no doubt that this work inherits many advantages of Spielberg’s version of ‘Jurassic Park’: rich imagination, exciting sense of horror and a touch of Reflection on the human being, and processed through a fresh twenty-first century perspective, presents a bucket of creamy popcorn. Is it perfect? Of course not

; , Eighty-five points, “No matter how you’re going to rate ‘Jurassic World’, the film’s stunning visual effects are enough to keep the viewer’s attention high enough to allow viewers to briefly escape from reality and into their own ignorance of the unknown. imagination, and eclipses those films that lack fantasy and dreams. And the best part is that it can awaken our love and enthusiasm for movie magic, which is enough to prove many things.

” Sound”, 83 points, “It’s a fresh and exciting film, every little bit of detail reminds people of the existence of the original series, but it’s definitely not a clumsy remake or copy, Trevorrow injected into the film. With fresh imagination and bold new interpretations, the film may not be destined to create a whole new world like it did twenty-two years ago, but at least it’s a good start to the series reboot.”

The Guardian, Eighty-Three, “Perfect for a summer break: fun, refreshing, exciting, thrilling, even a little ridiculously weird, with a witty twist. We can also ask for What? Plus, Renly-Hall still shines.

” Chicago Tribune, Eighty-Five, “If you just need a reason to go to the movies, then Renly-Hall has everything you need for a movie. , without a doubt, this is his most charming work, even dinosaurs have become his foil; if you need more reasons, then dinosaurs should be a plus.”

“US Weekly”, 80 , “Twenty years after dinosaurs dominated the earth’s cinema, can we still put down our mobile phones for two hours and let go of those self-satisfied ridicule and arrogance, and frankly admit that we are still shocked and sighed by the existence of that group of lives ? Trevorrow, who is clearly unwavering in his belief, whose sincerity and focus makes every viewer willing to admit and drink a little. Hall, he makes that point even more convincing.

” , praise is more objective and more forgiving: for commercial films, they do not strictly put forward unrealistic requirements, but evaluate at the level of market demand – after all, this is not “Interstellar”, they can Christopher Nolan raised expectations, but Colin Trevorrow and Universal were not prepared to dig deep at the core level, so there was no need.

UU reading www.sonicmtl.com

What’s more, from “Jurassic Park” to “Jurassic World”, audiences have never entered the cinema because “the film explores the relationship between humans and dinosaurs.” , as if the real classic of “Jaws” is definitely not in discussing the importance of protecting the natural environment.

All the positive reviews have reached a consensus: On top of the rhythm control and the climax, “Jurassic World” does meet the requirements, and even a small surprise.

As for the details, everyone has their own feelings, which leads to the difference in ratings, but it does not affect the excellence of the movie.

The most interesting part is not a compliment about Renly, but a point from a detailed New York Times review:

Renly Hall once spent a lot of time discussing and revising the script with Colin Trevorrow. The lengthy and cumbersome branch lines were cut a lot, reducing a little ambition, and forcing the script to be more concise and clear, which undoubtedly improved the quality of the finished product. A step up; in addition, the emotional interaction between Renly and Bryce also lays the groundwork, allowing the story to be extended, which is another detail worth paying attention to.

The latest website:

Note: If you see that the content of this chapter is the content of the anti-theft error, the book is broken, etc., please log in →→

[End of this Chapter]